- Messages
- 3,684
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/39522383@N00/27223220">http://www.flickr.com/photos/39522383@N00/27223220</a><!-- m -->
This White head tegu was caught in Tanti Argentina, this is the region known as Cordoba. So, calling these Chacoan White heads would be a false statement based on the region where this animal came from. Tanti is not part of the Chaco range, but rather Cordoba and is found much farther south in central Argentina.
This is a picture of a yearling from Rick's stock he is calling Chacoan, note that this animal and the one from Cordoba look very much alike.
Here is a map showing Cordoba, Chaco if much farther north.
So with this information, could it be said that white heads are in fact Chacoan tegus? Or rather just White headed normals?
In my opinion it would be very hard to make the claim that they come from Chaco when there is proof that they are found much farther south in Cordoba.
This White head tegu was caught in Tanti Argentina, this is the region known as Cordoba. So, calling these Chacoan White heads would be a false statement based on the region where this animal came from. Tanti is not part of the Chaco range, but rather Cordoba and is found much farther south in central Argentina.
This is a picture of a yearling from Rick's stock he is calling Chacoan, note that this animal and the one from Cordoba look very much alike.
Here is a map showing Cordoba, Chaco if much farther north.
So with this information, could it be said that white heads are in fact Chacoan tegus? Or rather just White headed normals?
In my opinion it would be very hard to make the claim that they come from Chaco when there is proof that they are found much farther south in Cordoba.